Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

Kathleen quoted this in her essay:

. "If you are a poet, you will see clearly that there is a cloud floating in this sheet of paper. Without a cloud, there will be no rain; without rain, the trees cannot grow: and without trees, we cannot make paper. The cloud is essential for the paper to exist. If the cloud is not here, the sheet of paper cannot be here either. So we can say that the cloud and the paper inter-are.”

Compare to this Buddhist take from the Korean teacher, Jae Woong Kim (1940-)

"In order for a bowl of rice to get to your table, the heavens must have let the sun shine to grow the rice paddy and scattered just enough rain to wet the shoots. The earth must have opened its heart to let the rice spread its roots, and the wind must have blown cool breezes to ripen the crops. The whole process must be teeming with the sweat of the farmer who planted the rice in spring, pulled the weeds in summer, harvested the crops in fall, and with the care of the one who made the warm bowl of rice, soaking it and boiling it.

Not only that but, in order for today's farming and table to exist, there had to be vertical accumulation of technologies from numerous ancestors and traditions. Horizontally there were precious efforts to produce farming tools, fertilizers, threshers, a rice mill, kitchen utensils, fuel and so on. Therefore, how can you call a bowl of rice yours just because you bought it with your money?

Trace its history--in a bowl of rice, there is the grace of the entire human race and the whole universe."

We have this passage on the wall of our kitchen below a picture of H.H. Tenzin Gyatso, 14th in his line.

All next to the spice rack. Interbeing.

Expand full comment
Cletis Boyer's avatar

Kathleen, thank you for this meditation on attunement. The attitude toward self that you call out in so many of us brings to mind Milton Mayeroff's "On Caring", wherein he argues that the measure of caring is to help another to grow and to care for yet others. Mayeroff illustrated this idea with many examples, especially a father's relationship with his children, and extended "caring for" to ideas (democracy) and institutions. He did not use the example of our relationship to Mother Earth, however, but well he might have.

Your essay also calls to mind Nancy Fraser's assessment of capitalism, "Cannibal Capitalism", in which she argues that an essential component of capitalism is treat nature, Mother Earth, as a resource, freely available for use for the pursuit of profit, and with absolutely no thought of the need for its repair or replenishment. I do see the hand of capitalism in shaping our view of ourselves inward, isolating us from "interbeing", and making it so difficult to fully comprehend our very interconnectedness with all else, perhaps especially with Mother Earth. There is no more powerful socialization agent in the world as capitalism. Call it, as many do, "consumerism" or "materialism", but I fear that we are all poisoned and sickened by it. The encyclicals of Pope Francis do not mention capitalism, but that is clearly the source of what he sees in our inability to care for our common home. Is "integral ecology" not attunement?

'True' caring is difficult to do, even for those who otherwise present themselves as caring, like the example of Dr. Shaw. I find it challenging to even sense this alienation I have from Mother Earth (and to sense the limitations of my efforts to care for others), even as I consider myself a caring person and "climate activist". So thank you for a meditation that allowed me to see connections that I had missed in writings that matter to me. Cletis

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts